CC-Transcript

• 00:00Probably bankers utilizing the green shoes. So especially with this. So you kind of use the shares with the thing with when you do an IPO, you sell a bunch of shares and then banks can buy other shares at the IPO price. So typically the whole mechanism operates to basically give some form of balance with the deal. So I was talking to a few bankers a way that sounds orchestrated to me. It’s orchestrated. I mean, don’t ask Bill Ackman about it. He has some pretty strong thoughts on it. But I was talking to a banker away from the deal and he was basically saying, when you see a deal like this where so much of the book, as we’ve reported, has been allocated to a handful of investors, people will get Jerry. So if you see the stock dropping and you’re a hedge fund who bought this to make a quick buck, right? You want to get out as quick as you can and then the banks will wait for that kind of rush of volume, help stabilize the price, and then that can set up for, you know, down two and a half to up two and a half, but still marginal. Is that not normal to have, what, half of the book allocated to the three largest investors? That is tighter than I can think of in recent memory. We normally will have some deals that are they call them clubby, but as we reported, half the book to three investors. So $750 million of stock chopped up. And then if you look even further at our reporting, top 15 took 90% of the deal, so very tightly allocated to almost frenzied Morgan Stanley, if you will. All right, clubby friends, all that good stuff. Having said that, Ryan, going into this, it was downsized, so we had reduced expectations going into it based on that. And we are now showing a little bit of a gain. Is this a good debut, a bad debut or neutral? I think it’s probably slide. I don’t think that person, but I think it is still slightly too early. Let’s see where we are at four because I think you know the greens you point. Sure. But I was also talking to Michael in Toronto this morning, the CEO of Colby. And you know, he was quite quick to point out, aside, you know, away from the noise that we’ve seen this week in markets and, you know, just given where the Nasdaq is and the S & P is today, Covid does not like most other tech companies that some of these investors, you know, would be putting orders in for. I mean, his his view is that it’s quite capital intensive and it is just based on the business model. Of course, even so, his view is in telling me this morning on the phone was that investors are going to take some time to actually get their heads around how we do things. And, you know, it’s going to be a little bit of a process. So I think you could probably see some volatility for for a period. And, you know, I mean, we’re at 1491 now. It is conspicuously in that $40 area. You know, the price there, their CEO speak of the place. You know, ask him, Carol, I don’t know how to how should we We’re smart here at Bloomberg, like for sure. You read that. You know, and I put that to him. And, you know, I think there’s a lot going on. I mean, you’ve obviously got the Microsoft headline this week, which we spoke about yesterday. But then at the same time, their biggest customer. It is. Yeah. And you would have to imagine in that among that sort of, you know, taking 50% of the book to, I’m sure, in and around that area. And, you know, I actually put to Michael Moore this morning around sort of the Nvidia angle and, you know, again, away from some of the noise, he said that without Nvidia and without the other 27 investors, this IPO wouldn’t have got over the line. Interesting. Hmm. Okay. How did they do it then? Or is it because they knew they had those backstops? I think, you know, for a coach, for a company like that, the the thesis is quite clear. It’s just it becomes it’s evaluation mechanism right now if you’re an investor, because I think, you know, the free cash flow is very good. I mean, people are generally quite comfortable with the leverage, but it’s always coming back to sort of some of the concerns around customer concentration. And, you know, they’re quite quick to point out that the open air contract that they agreed, you know, quite recently to almost $12 billion is a boon. And, you know, it is. But at the same time, you’re still faced with 77% of your revenue on paper coming from essentially two customers. So regardless of what sector you’re in, whether you’re air or otherwise, people are going to look at that and think, is that okay for us? And you take a view. Yeah, barely, even though. So this is a little bit different of an IPO. It’s certainly a canary in the coal mine or some sort of bellwether for other companies that are on the sidelines right now thinking about going public. What’s at stake here? A lot, but also not a lot. Okay, let’s put it put it this way. The biggest side, the biggest IPO of the year was venture global. Similar downsize cut the book by about 40% priced poorly traded poorly down north of 57%. When I talk to bankers and investors there for call they were vocal. This is a one off we’re not worried about it. This deal comes out talking to bankers yesterday. We’re not too worried about it. But it begs the question, when will people be worried about it? Because when you have six of the ten largest U.S. IPOs year to date trading below offer, you can point to the market being down as much as you want. But at the end of the day, people buy IPOs to outperform the market, right? If you’re not getting a day one pop or even a month later outperformance, that starts to make people second guess, why am I going to allocate resources to a private company that I’ve maybe met once or twice when I can buy your direct peers at a discount? And that’s kind of what’s been playing out. It also makes me wonder, you know, at Bloomberg Invest this year, I talked with the president of the New York Stock Exchange, Len Martin, and the expectations were that this was going to be a better year for M & A, for IPOs. Highly anticipated was core we’ve and some others that were substantial in terms of their size. So I’m just kind of wondering, is there something systemic going on in the IPO market or is it just once again, you know, because. Right, like, well, like give us some context in terms of the last few years. So we’re in entering now the fourth year of very lackluster IPO offerings. So ever since the market really got shut late 2021, early 2022, you’ve had dribs and drabs. AAM has been terrific Reddit has performed outside of the pullback all things considered quite well but when we’ve had three years of bankers and CEOs pointing towards the market not being there even though we’re at all time highs now you’re dealing with a market pulling back a number of companies early investors may be saying hey we penciled in 2025, we need to get this puck on the ice. And when you interview when you when Bloomberg investors playing out the VIX was back above 20, we’re back above 20 again. That’s where people on the banking side look at as a okay, maybe we should rethink this or we need to be more diligent with how we price these deals and how we communicate to investors. But there’s as you mentioned, since March 14th, the market’s been choppy. Klarna, StubHub, eToro and Integrity Insurance have all flipped public, so they’ve opened the door to going. But but go ahead, Ryan. You’re going to jump in and say I think it points to a wider question that’s going on between investors large, you know, tier one investors in the banks around, you know, what is the true quality of most companies trying to go public these days and how much of a discount is necessary to get them over the line. I mean, we’ve talked a lot about, I think, you know, on the desk, certainly around the nature of the IPO discount, it has narrowed, you know, in recent years. But is there an idea that it could start to widen again, given some of the price pressure that we’re seeing in some of these debuts? I also think about, you know, this is something I know you guys cover and we talk about Tim and I, the private markets. And just again, there’s so much cash out there. I mean, how how old is core? We’ve it’s been around for, I think June 2017. It’s a younger company. All right. Because we have seen a lot of companies that are able to stay private for a lot longer. I mean, look, a client, right? We talked about that the other day. This is like a company that’s almost as old as Facebook. Yeah, it’s wild. Yeah. So it’s it’s kind of interesting. All right, so then what’s the outlook? We got just about a minute or so left. I mean, Ryan, how are you thinking about this today and maybe what’s to come or what are you hearing from? Yeah, I mean, you know, I think the point on private private capital in general is a prescient one because, you know, there is someone I was speaking to this morning who was away from the from this deal that we’re talking about today. And they’re kind of saying, you know, our IPO is, again, being seen as sort of the last resort, you know, as opposed to a sign of strength. And, you know, what does it mean for those who look to go And, you know, Kleiner could in theory, go as soon as next week, but are they will barely mention all these companies that in the last few weeks have flipped to going public. How much can they actually delay just in the last 30 seconds that we have, there’s no rule. So technically you can be on file for as long as you want. You just pay lawyers to Ryan’s. Klarna The earliest they could launch a roadshow would be Monday. So that’s what we’ll be watching. But again, tariff day is next week and who knows what’s going to go Well, hopefully for your sake for the weekend, I hope that doesn’t happen. You get a break. You get a break, everybody.